Search Details

Word: abortment (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

With the arrival of RU 486 in the U.S. -- especially in a form that requires the woman merely to take pills rather than also get a shot -- the vision of some pro-choice advocates, that the drug could abort the abortion debate, will be tested. Will antiabortion activists find ways to restrict the availability of the abortion pill? And if not, will RU 486 really obviate the clinics and confound the picketers...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: But Will It End the Abortion Debate? | 6/14/1993 | See Source »

...demanding that the French government reverse Roussel's decision. Within 48 hours, Health Minister Claude Evin declared that once government approval had been granted, "RU 486 became the moral property of women," and he ordered Roussel to resume distribution. In 1989 RU 486 was made available to all licensed abortion clinics and hospitals in France. The results proved encouraging, save for a freak incident in 1991 when a woman who was an avid smoker suffered a heart attack while trying to use RU 486 to abort her 13th pregnancy. After that mishap, the government banned use of the pill...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Abortion Pill: New, Improved and Ready for Battle | 6/14/1993 | See Source »

...French began testing the new method of using RU 486 that does not require going to a clinic for a follow-up shot. An oral prostaglandin, commercially marketed as Cytotec by the American manufacturer G.D. Searle, enabled women to abort simply by swallowing a combination of pills. The efficiency rate rose from 95.5% to 96.9%, and the speed of the procedure improved. In 61% of the cases, the uterine contents were expelled within four hours after taking Cytotec, in contrast to 47% in the case of prostaglandin injections. Although there were instances of nausea and diarrhea, which are also common...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Abortion Pill: New, Improved and Ready for Battle | 6/14/1993 | See Source »

...most profound disagreement. I will never, ever accept that abortion is justified because a child might suffer or it is unwanted. Those are two of the most selfish, unpredictable reasons to abort a child that I can imagine. And they cut to the quick of why I'm opposed to it. If that were applied, Beethoven might not have lived. Jesse Jackson might not have lived, for crying out loud...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: An Interview with RUSH LIMBAUGH | 10/26/1992 | See Source »

Formerly, the surrogate mother and the couple employing her signed a contract that specified her fee, promised her payment of medical expenses, and required that she give up the baby. In some cases, it also required her to abort an abnormal fetus. Under the new law, payment is allowed only for medical expenses. Any further commercial transaction was illegal resulted in a fine...

Author: By Jendi B. Reiter, | Title: Surrogacy Laws: What Price Motherhood? | 8/4/1992 | See Source »

Previous | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | Next