Search Details

Word: acceptance (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1950-1959
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...said that over 200 fewer students were accepted this year as compared to the 1800 of last year. In the likely event that not enough students accept Harvard, Leighton said applications will be taken from a waiting list of about...

Author: By Bernard M. Gwertzman, | Title: Fewer Admitted to '60 To Ease Overcrowding | 5/17/1956 | See Source »

...other professor invited to Russia, Garrett Birkhoff '32, professor of Pure and Applied Mathematics, said that he will not be able to accept his invitation to the Third Mathematical Congress of the U.S.S.R...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Jakobson Will Arrive Today Inside Russia | 5/16/1956 | See Source »

...boys and the girls are taught in the same classrooms but they may not associate. A passed note conceived in puppy love is enough to bring down severe punishment. A stolen kiss, a harmless rendezvous, may result in being "shipped," and the likelihood that no other school will accept what Canopus has discarded...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Books: An Insight into Blindness | 5/14/1956 | See Source »

First, Struik could be reindicted if the State Attorney General successfully appeals the Gilbert decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, but the high tribunal would be unlikely to accept the case after its contrary Nelson ruling. Second, Congress itself could broaden the intent of Federal Communist control acts to tolerate existing state laws. But such an interpretation would be valid for the 84th Congress only, and could not legally be held to apply retroactively to a case like Struik's. And, finally, in response to the petition of 42 state Attorneys General, the Federal court could hear re-argument...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Struik Reconsidered | 5/8/1956 | See Source »

...added up to one of the biggest U.S. news snafus in years, triggered by a U.S. Supreme Court order so terse that the entire Washington press corps misunderstood it. "The appeal is dismissed," the Justices said, as they refused to accept an appeal of a case in which a lower court had held South Carolina's bus segregation law unconstitutional. Then the Supreme Court cryptically cited an obscure, 27-year-old Nebraska civil case, Slaker v. O'Connor, that touched off the bulletins. Actually, the only relationship between Slaker v. O'Connor and the case at hand...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: THE SUPREME COURT: The Bus Bust | 5/7/1956 | See Source »

Previous | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | Next