Search Details

Word: aec (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1970-1979
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Though Kerr-McGee installed safeguards to protect its employees from the hazards of plutonium, Silkwood was critical of the plant's health and safety procedures. Last September, in testimony before the AEC, she complained about unsafe working conditions. In early November, she became living proof of those dangers. On two consecutive days, as Silkwood was leaving work, sensitive plant monitors detected that she was slightly contaminated by radioactivity. She was promptly scrubbed clean. Later, she brought in urine and fecal samples; they proved to be radioactive. On a third day, the monitors clicked when she entered the plant...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Environment: The Silkwood Mystery | 1/20/1975 | See Source »

Meantime, the AEC launched its own probe of working conditions at the plant. The commission's records showed that since Kerr-McGee started its plutonium operations in 1970, 17 safety lapses-in which 73 employees were contaminated-had been reported. The union produced a list of 39 additional allegations of sloppiness in plutonium handling. Then in mid-December, two new cases involving five persons were reported to the AEC; Kerr-McGee quickly denounced them as "contrived." Yet the incidents were serious enough to force the company to shut the plant for more than two weeks...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Environment: The Silkwood Mystery | 1/20/1975 | See Source »

Last week the AEC completed its investigation. It found that only three of the 39 union allegations represented violations of the commission's standards, though another 17 had "substance or partial substance." The report pleased Kerr-McGee, but the union was "not satisfied." Environmental groups also pointed out that the AEC needed the fuel rods and thus had a clear interest in keeping Kerr-McGee's plant in operation...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Environment: The Silkwood Mystery | 1/20/1975 | See Source »

Central Maine Power has planned hearings with the state department of Environmental Protection for next fall, and with the AEC for June 1976. The citizen's group plans to continue its educational campaign, and may eventually intervene in the state hearings...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Union of Concerned Scientists Opposes Maine Nuclear Plant | 12/16/1974 | See Source »

Ford said one major goal of his visit was to question AEC motives in encouraging the location of nuclear power plants in sparsely populated areas. "They're plainly adopting a policy of sparing the major population centers, which raises doubts as to the degree of confidence they have in the remoteness of major accidents," he said...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Union of Concerned Scientists Opposes Maine Nuclear Plant | 12/16/1974 | See Source »

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | Next