Word: agnew
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1970-1979
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...prosecutors have conducted, as Agnew says, a "deliberate campaign" of leaks, it constitutes a serious breach of their duty as officers of the court. In that context, the judge's grant of broad subpoena powers can be seen as giving Agnew the fairest chance of gathering evidence to support his contention...
What, then, are the objections to Agnew's having such powers...
They can be used to tactical advantage for other purposes. The statute of limitations may soon bar prosecution of some of Agnew's alleged offenses, so any delay resulting from an investigation into the leaks would be to Agnew's advantage. And Harvard Law Professor John Ely points out that it will be difficult for the defense attorneys "to investigate leaks without being given access to the entirety of the Government's case, which is wrong." The broad powers to fish for any information they want could also be used to harass the prosecution. Says Columbia...
What happens if Agnew proves his charges...
...judge could go along with Agnew's request and terminate the grand jury investigation. There is a recent rough analogy. In the Ellsberg case, the judge ruled that Government misconduct had so infected the charges that they must be permanently dropped. If Judge Hoffman made a similar ruling, however, the Vice President would not necessarily be free of further investigation. He could still face impeachment charges. Of course, Hoffman could find that the leaks have caused Agnew no significant harm before the grand jury. The few faintly relevant cases suggest that the present grand jury will be allowed...