Search Details

Word: amendmenteers (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Expressing further doubt with FAIR’s claims, several justices suggested that law schools could counteract the Solomon Amendment by expressing their own views on “don’t ask, don’t tell” directly to students.

Author: By Daniel J. Hemel, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Justices Skeptical of Free Speech Argument in Solomon Case | 12/6/2005 | See Source »

O’Connor emphasized that, even under the Solomon Amendment, law schools can express their opposition to the military’s policy “to every student that enters the room.”

Author: By Daniel J. Hemel, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Justices Skeptical of Free Speech Argument in Solomon Case | 12/6/2005 | See Source »

Justice David H. Souter ‘61, a onetime Lowell House resident who provided The Crimson with two tickets to today’s oral arguments, appeared to be particularly sympathetic to FAIR’s free-speech claims. The law schools argue that the Solomon Amendment hinders their...

Author: By Daniel J. Hemel, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Justices Skeptical of Free Speech Argument in Solomon Case | 12/6/2005 | See Source »

But Souter appeared to have few allies in this case. “Only Justice Souter is a very clear vote for the First Amendment argument” offered by FAIR, Tribe said.

Author: By Daniel J. Hemel, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Justices Skeptical of Free Speech Argument in Solomon Case | 12/6/2005 | See Source »

“You cannot convert a law into a law directed at First Amendment rights—can you?—by simply saying the reason I am disobeying it is to express, whatever disaffection with the war, homosexuality, or anything else,” Scalia said.

Author: By Daniel J. Hemel, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Justices Skeptical of Free Speech Argument in Solomon Case | 12/6/2005 | See Source »

Previous | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | Next