Search Details

Word: amicus (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...amicus curiae brief filed before the Supreme Court this week, Harvard has once again taken up the cause of affirmative action and racial diversity. Nearly 25 years ago, Harvard played an important role in defining and defending affirmative action in the much-heralded University of California Board of Regents v. Bakke case. In the amicus curiae brief that it filed for that case, Harvard explained how its affirmative action plan worked, and how it could be justified to a country heavily invested in questions of equality and racial justice. In Bakke, Harvard’s “plus factor?...

Author: By The CRIMSON Staff, | Title: Keep Affirmative Action Strong | 2/21/2003 | See Source »

...specifics of the University of Michigan’s undergraduate and graduate admissions policies would have been ideal, it was more important for Harvard to defend affirmative action in general. The focus of the public debate on affirmative action changed when President George W. Bush filed his own amicus brief questioning the very foundations of such a policy. Afterwards, it became necessary for Harvard to respond to the fundamental attacks on such a valuable policy for schools that value diversity...

Author: By The CRIMSON Staff, | Title: Keep Affirmative Action Strong | 2/21/2003 | See Source »

...Minutes since the Bush administration filed an amicus brief opposing the University of Michigan’s use of affirmative action policies in its law school admissions...

Author: By The CRIMSON Staff, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Minutes | 2/20/2003 | See Source »

...case such as this, the court receives many amicus briefs. If each school submitted an individual one, there would be many more briefs than the court has time to read,” Donin said...

Author: By Jenifer L. Steinhardt, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Harvard Files Brief With High Court | 2/18/2003 | See Source »

...those who wish to Liberate the world from Leaders besides our own. Let’s Go! Immediately, a flurry of confused responses followed from good citizens who took him at his word—thereby missing the point. Would-be critics were up all night filing amicus briefs in our inboxes supporting Winerman’s right to form his group and solicit membership under whatever terms he pleased. The idea of invading countries to replace their current leaders with ones conducive to American national interests is noxious and simple-minded in itself, but cloak the notion...

Author: By Madeleine S. Elfenbein, | Title: Fighting Words | 2/14/2003 | See Source »

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | Next