Word: appellant
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...presentation; and their arguments formed a more connected whole. On the other hand the Seniors showed lack of team work and based their arguments on general suppositions, which the Juniors handled cleverly and proved to be absurd in practice. J. W. Plaisted, A. N. Holcombe, and J. W. Appel made up the Senior team, and spoke in the order named. The Junior order was: A. B. Church, R. E. Gish, A. H. Elder...
...form of exclusion for all persons paying less than $7 per month rent. This speech was well refuted by R. E. Gish for the negative, who pointed out the evils of a limited franchise in the United States., In the last speech for the affirmative J. W. Appel showed the inefficiency of the corruptible class to vote for reasonable measures; but his arguments were squarely met by A. H. Elder, for the negative, who showed that the property qualification was not only inadequate to cure the present evils, but was in itself the cause of municipal corruption...
...Resolved, That if it were possible a reasonable property qualification for the exercise of the municipal franchise in the United States would be desirable." In this debate the Senior team, which will maintain the affirmative, will speak in the following order: J. W. Plaisted, A. N. Holcombe, J. W. Appel. In the rebuttals, however, Appel will speak second, and Holcombe last. R. L. Hale has been appointed alternate. The order of the Junior speakers, who have chosen to support the negative, is: R. E. Gish, A. B. Church, A. H. Elder. In rebuttal the men will speak in the same...
...following men, whose names were omitted from the provisional list of voters, have been declared eligible by the Election Committee: J. W. Appel, A. P. Crum, H. E. Ditmars, S. D. Malcolm, L. A. Sloper, S. F. Strother...
Second tenors--J. W. Appel '06, N. B. Groton '07, B. M. Langstaff...