Word: argument
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1920-1929
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
When asked it the fact that Mexicans are considered incapable of managing their affairs would not justify foreign ownership and control of industrialization, Mr. Tannenbaum said that this argument is based on assumptions alone. "All races are equally capable to the task of managing their industrial problems at the beginning. The United States, England, and the rest of the world has paid an enormous price for its great industrialization. Besides, the Mexicans are very clever. They can carry their own load. They have included all industrial problems in their Constitution, They trust none of these problems like the eight hour...
...other end of the scale of argument, were the states' rights champions, who said flatly that the Senate had no Constitutional right to reject a duly elected Senator? be he a moron, a crook, a leper or anything else. Said Senator Bingham of Connecticut, a Republican: "The Senate has no divine right to keep itself 'holy and unspotted from the world.' It was created by the people of the United States to do for them certain things which they could not do so well themselves. To choose their representatives was not one of them. . . . Is the Senate empowered...
...strange germs in milk and fed the milk to cats. In a few hours the cats were violently ill, as ill as were the folk of Biddeford, with intestinal disturbances. Said Dr. Thorn: "While there is no general danger from this source of poisoning, it does offer another forceful argument for the pasteurization of milk before using it in manufacturing dairy products...
...coming debates. Professor J. H. Beale '82 will preside when the Scott and Chaffee Clubs meet: Professor Calvert Magruder over the Holmes and Sanford debate; Professor E. M. Morgan '03 over the Harlen and Bryce-Powell debate, and Assistant Professor J. M. Landis over the Beale-Pound argument...
...field aggressively against our talkative foe and Holy Cross certainly, initiated the offensive since stilly when on cast Wednesday evening the Department of Biology conducted a lively debate on the problem of Organic Evolution. This intellectually connected a lively debate on the problem of Organic Evolution. This intellectually conducted argument in which the "pros" and "antis" of the question were permitted the utmost academic freedom in the presentation of their respective sides constitutes a ringing refutation to the cry of "obscurantism." Each team had its day in court, and the defenders of Organic Evolution were awarded the decision...