Search Details

Word: ascap (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1930-1939
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Round No. 1 was Radio's when it persuaded the Federal-Government to charge the American Society of Composers, Authors & Publishers with violation of the Sherman Antitrust Law (TIME, Sept. 10). Round No. 2 came in November when ASCAP countered with a driving defense, filed in behalf of its 1,015 songwriters and publishers. For the use of its members' music ASCAP now demands a 5% share of broadcasters' net receipts. Radio claims that it would be starved without the millions of songs which ASCAP controls. But Radio objects to ASCAP's price...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Music: U. S. v. ASCAP | 7/1/1935 | See Source »

Fortnight ago in a stifling Manhattan courtroom the fight began in earnest. The Government described ASCAP as a gigantic music trust, unreasonably suppressing free competition in interstate commerce. Prosecutor Andrew W. Bennett made ASCAP seem exceedingly high-handed by showing that its general 5% license fee preyed even upon non-musical programs, that ASCAP collected 5?out of every $1 that broadcasters received for Father Coughlin's preachings. "Oppressive" again was the way the Society charged an electrical transcription fee ranging from 25? to 50? for each broadcast of a record. ASCAP's defense was that...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Music: U. S. v. ASCAP | 7/1/1935 | See Source »

Round No. 3, which ended last week, was a victory for ASCAP. Though the Government had insisted on beginning the trial this month, its witnesses wavered so under cross-examination that it was glad to adjourn to bolster up its case. Witness William J. Benning, musical director of Radio Station WTMJ in Milwaukee, asserted that he would be unable to operate without the popular music in ASCAP's catalog. ASCAP controls many an orchestration where it does not control the original tune. Milwaukee's Benning admitted that in such cases his station chose to use ASCAP...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Music: U. S. v. ASCAP | 7/1/1935 | See Source »

...ASCAP's chief lawyer is smart Nathan Burkan, friend of the late Victor Herbert, who founded the Society in 1914. Herbert's aim was to prevent song-pirating in theatres and restaurants. Most songwriters he knew were too indigent or too careless to look out for their own pocketbooks. A big organization was needed to bargain, do the necessary detective work. When Radio appeared and popular sheet-music sales suddenly slumped some 75%, ASCAP was ready for action...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Music: U. S. v. ASCAP | 7/1/1935 | See Source »

Lawyer Burkan claims that ASCAP controls only 3% of the current musical copyrights. (Unfortunately for broadcasters, the 3% represents the popular tunes most in demand.) The Government has contended that music is a physical thing-a commodity which is transmitted from State to State. Burkan's persistent retort has been that music is "intangible and incorporeal." Lawyer Thomas Day Thacher. U. S. Solicitor General under Herbert Hoover, entered the trial to argue that ASCAP existed only to protect the rights of composers and lyric writers, pooh-poohed the idea that the organization was potent enough to dominate an industry...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Music: U. S. v. ASCAP | 7/1/1935 | See Source »

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | Next