Search Details

Word: atomizer (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Opponents of the atom, however, are stretching their point when they suggest that what happened at Chernobyl could just as easily happen in the U.S. There are few comparisons between the way nuclear power is managed in the U.S. and the way it is handled in the Soviet Union. The biggest difference is technological. Only one of the 100 reactors currently licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to operate commercially in the U.S. is graphite moderated like the one at Chernobyl, and it is cooled by gas rather than water, which makes it substantially safer. One of five reactors operated...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Bracing for the Fallout | 5/12/1986 | See Source »

More than 200 undergraduates this spring will participate in the performance of a Harvard instructor's musical mass about the development of the atom bomb...

Author: By Brooke A. Masters, | Title: Musical Mass Written On Atom Bomb History | 2/15/1986 | See Source »

...Harvard physics professors probing the ultimate nature of matter came one step closer last Sunday with the successful test run of the world's most powerful atom smasher at Fermi National Accelerator Lab near Chicago...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Wham, Bam | 10/18/1985 | See Source »

...years since the Enola Gay, a B-29 long-range medium bomber, dropped its atom bomb over Hiroshima, America's nuclear-weapons systems have evolved into what has been known for the past 25 years as the Triad. The name comes from the fact that U.S. strategic nuclear weapons are based in the water, on land and in the air. Defense strategists agree almost universally that all three legs of the Triad are essential because each by itself has weaknesses that are offset only by the strengths of the other two. Land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), for example...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Toning Up the Nuclear Triad | 9/23/1985 | See Source »

...earmarked for the next few years. That is an incredible amount for pure research, as emphasized even by U.S. scientists as well. The point is that in today's prices those appropriations are more than four times the cost of the Manhattan Project (the program for development of the atom bomb) and more than double the cost of the Apollo program that provided for the development of space research for a whole decade--up to the landing of man on the moon. That this is far from being a pure research program is also confirmed by other facts, including tests...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: An Interview with Mikhail Gorbachev | 9/9/1985 | See Source »

Previous | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | Next