Search Details

Word: attackers (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 2000-2009
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...Enjoying a .440 team attack percentage, Harvard took the second set 30-17 and looked focused on finishing off the Engineers...

Author: By Kevin T. Chen, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Crimson Claims Three from MIT | 3/18/2009 | See Source »

...With the game still close, Harvard started to pull away slowly, relying on another service ace by Weissbourd and a kill by senior Jeff Nathan to put the Crimson up by two. Finally, an attack error by MIT junior Eric Reuland gave Harvard...

Author: By Kevin T. Chen, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Crimson Claims Three from MIT | 3/18/2009 | See Source »

...Martin said. “We want to be the team that puts them away in the beginning and doesn’t give them any chance to come back.”Harvard’s top two scorers, Martin and sophomore Jess Halpern, once again led the attack with five goals apiece. Martin threw in two assists while Halpern had one, as four of their teammates also got on the scoreboard. Tri-captain Sara Flood and freshman standout Tyler Petropulous each contributed a score and an assist. Husky captain Whitney Michele led all scorers with eight points...

Author: By Dennis J. Zheng, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Crimson Holds On For Tight Win | 3/18/2009 | See Source »

...Indeed, with up to 600 million viewers worldwide, Eurovision is a very large platform. Which is why Noa, after first being chosen to represent Israel solo, insisted that Awad accompany her to Moscow. The move provoked almost immediate attack from both Israeli Jewish and Arab groups. Awad, who is originally from Israel's northern Galilee region, was criticized by Arab-Israeli cultural figures for agreeing to sing on Israel's behalf at the height of its offensive in Gaza. The usually dovish Noa, meanwhile, came under fire for calling upon Gazans to rid their coastal territory of Hamas control...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Eurovision: The Answer for Peace in the Middle East? | 3/17/2009 | See Source »

...commission courts were not post-conflict institutions intended to mete out justice for war crimes. They were, instead, functional components of Britain’s global efforts to suppress the slave trade in peacetime. Countries ratified the courts’ founding treaties because of incentives like money, threat of attack, and involvement. Each nation had a judge and a commissioner of arbitration involved, holding equal power on the court benches. The model was largely successful; the mixed commissions liberated about 80,000 slaves in their 50 years of existence...

Author: By Noah M. Silver | Title: Collaborative Justice | 3/17/2009 | See Source »

Previous | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | Next