Search Details

Word: baghdad (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...that could save Democrats the political pain of an open battle with Bush. Even Leahy's office holds out little hope of rolling back Bush's wiretapping program. And Reid's non-binding resolution on Iraq will do nothing to slow the reported imminent deployment of more troops to Baghdad. By the time the Administration's request for emergency funds for the war comes through next month, opponents of the surge will be in the position of having to vote against money for troops already in a war zone. And even the most outspoken critics of the Bush White House...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Dems: More Bark Than Bite | 1/10/2007 | See Source »

...allies have said is the President's last chance to recapture the public's trust in his performance on Iraq before it flickers out completely, Bush announced the deployment of more than 20,000 additional troops to Iraq to address what he called the "urgent priority" of security in Baghdad. He told the country that the Iraqis were finally ready to take responsibility for their own security and laid out an ambitious plan to embed American forces inside Iraqi army and police units all over the capital city...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: A Sketchy Blueprint for Iraq | 1/10/2007 | See Source »

...Bush talked vaguely about benchmarks, but he did not say what would happen if the Iraqis fail to meet them. The framers of the surge - a military historian and a retired general working under the auspices of the American Enterprise Institute - envisioned it taking 18-24 months to stabilize Baghdad and did not tie it to any particular progress by the government. But whatever the levers, there is no agreement that the U.S. can sustain a surge for that long without a significant drop in readiness and a growing shortage of equipment. That was another reason the generals were...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: A Sketchy Blueprint for Iraq | 1/10/2007 | See Source »

Whatever the military merits of sending 21,500 more American soldiers into Iraq, President Bush's proposed "surge" is likely to be undermined by politics. No, not in Washington-in Baghdad...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Maliki: No Fan of the Surge | 1/10/2007 | See Source »

...Pres. Bush said al-Maliki had promised U.S. forces would be given a free hand, and that "political or sectarian interference will not be tolerated." Such interference has in the past blighted U.S. efforts to curb the Shi'ite militias responsible for most of the sectarian killing, especially in Baghdad...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Maliki: No Fan of the Surge | 1/10/2007 | See Source »

Previous | 271 | 272 | 273 | 274 | 275 | 276 | 277 | 278 | 279 | 280 | 281 | 282 | 283 | 284 | 285 | 286 | 287 | 288 | 289 | 290 | 291 | Next