Word: bauers
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1970-1979
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
Friar captain Tom Bauer broke a 3-3 deadlock at 15:52 of the third period to win the game. Bauer, capitalizing on a three-on-two break, nailed a wristshot into the upper right corner of the goal as Harvard forwards George Hughes, Gene Purdy, and Mike Watson lackadaisically trailed the play...
...pass from captain John Cochrane, but the tally, Benson's fifth of the year, lulled the Crimson back into a state of complacency. Harvard's Jim Trainor refused to knock Friar Steve O'Neill from the slot in front of Hynes, and the forward easily collected a pass from Bauer and beat Hynes from five feet out just 39 seconds after Benson's goal...
First Period: PC--Steve Evangelista (Jim Colucci) 6:45; PC--Colucci (Dan Haskins, Bob Bonin) 16:03. Second Period: H--Rick Benson (John Cochrane, David Burke) 5:40; PC--Steve O'Neill (Tom Bauer, Jim Korn) 6:01; H--Mike Watson (George Hughes, Jack Hughes) 19:02; H--G. Hughes (J. Hughes, John Dunderdale) 19:41. Third Period: PC--Bauer (Korn, Evangelista) 15:52; PC--Randy Wilson (Denis Martin...
...principles appear to be the decisive factors. The fear of political failure seized the CLC and made the possibility the reality. Clearly unable to muster sufficient strength to force its way with the government, the CLC preferred to remain aloof and not dirty its hands. But behind this fear, Bauer's comments suggest that the CLC used the postal confrontation to discipline its own ranks, and to further centralize the labor movement under its direction...
...Bauer complained that the postal union did not properly inform the CLC of the state of negotiations and the particular points under discussion. Bauer added that "labor solidarity is a two-way street" and argued that the postal union ought to have compromised its autonomy in negotiations in return for possible labor support on the right-to-strike question. But the general issue of the right-to-strike and the specifics of the contract discussions are clearly distinct and independent, and confusing them appears to be a mere pretense for the CLC to more directly interfere in the autonomous affairs...