Word: beasley
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1970-1979
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...REVIEW OF the circumstances of Brown-Beasley's and the superintendent's departures suggest a solid prima facie case against Harvard, although not necessarily on racial discrimination grounds. Take first the case of the B&G employee, Julian K. Fredie: arrested on July 27 for threatening a Radcliffe student, Fredie is suspended with pay. Two weeks later, shortly after his conviction on the criminal charge, Fredie resigns from his job at Harvard...
...about the same time Brown-Beasley is receiving markedly different treatment. After quarreling, against his boss's orders, with another employee whom he felt was endangering an expensive Holyoke Center computer, Brown-Beasley is fired. Hiss boss, R. Jerrold Gibson '51, director of the Office of Fiscal Services, has taken none of the "progressive" disciplinary steps mandated by the salaried personnel manual: informal oral warnings recorded by the employer, warning letters and suspension...
This is where Brown-Beasley's banana converter comes in. Since the August 4th firing Harvard's defense has leaned partially on a disturbingly vague clause in the personnel manual that reads, "Discharge without prior warnings or suspension may be justified for very serious offenses, for example, serious dishonesty, including theft of University property." (Harvard's arguments also rest on the University's contention that Brown-Beasley, who admits he is eccentric and hard to get along with, has a record of difficulties in jobs he has held at Harvard since 1969. But Brown-Beasley's University personnel file contains...
...Brown-Beasley has argued, Harvard's broad interpretation of the clause grew even more dubious when the press revealed earlier this fall that Fredie--who had certainly been charged with a far more serious act than Brown-Beasley-had been suspended with pay after his arrest and had never been fired. Brown-Beasley correctly points out that Harvard's action was appropriate, since employees should be considered innocent until proven guilty. But Brown-Beasley also rightly insists that he, as an employee charged merely with insubordination, certainly also deserved the protection of due process. Harvard's response--that the charges...
...would be difficult to prove, however, that Harvard handled the two cases differently because Brown-Beasley is white and Fredie is black. A more likely scenario is that Brown-Beasley could be fired with little fuss, his oddities and outspokenness having weakened his standing within the administration. The Fredie case, on the other hand, was potentially explosive: there were charges that Harvard higher-ups were involved in the alleged prostitution operation and students had definitely been linked to the case. Indeed the delay in the publicizing of the conviction suggests the care with which Harvard and the court authorities handled...