Search Details

Word: boarding (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1940-1949
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

After a meeting of the executive board last night, Roy F. Gootenberg '49 IPA, president of the College AVC, announced that copies of the protest will be sent to National AVC Chairman Michael Straight in Washington and to all AVC members in Congress...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: AVC to Fight 'Stool Pigeon' Clause in National Campaign | 12/6/1949 | See Source »

...member-at-large of the executive board of the Liberal Union (SDA affiliate in the College), will serve as coordinator of New England activities of the student branch of Americans for Democratic Action...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Fox Heads N.E. S.D.A. | 12/6/1949 | See Source »

Flanders was elected to his first Senate term in 1946. He was president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston from 1944 to 1946. Before that he was chairman of the board of Jones & Lamson Company, held several positions in government agencies, and was chairman of the Research Committee and trustee of the Committee for Economic Development...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Flanders to Lecture Tonight On 'The American Century' | 12/6/1949 | See Source »

...order is that of "guilt by association," a doctrine first suggested by the Dies Committee in October, 1938 when it demanded the firing of teachers who attended meetings sponsored by alleged communist front organizations. In regard to the doctrine which is now being used by the President's Loyalty Board, Justice Murphy, in bridges v. Wixon, 326 US 135, 163 (1945) said: "The doctrine of personal guilt is one of the fundamental principles of our jurisprudence. It partakes of the very essence of the concept of freedom and due process to law." The standard so well advocated by Justice Murphy...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Against the Loyalty Oaths | 12/5/1949 | See Source »

That proceedings before the Loyalty Board violate most of these safeguards is clear. The Attorney General may arbitrarily place organization on his list and is not required by law to give any reasons for his action; the organization has no right to a hearing; individuals accused of "disloyalty" are not tried by a jury, have no right to counsel, are not clearly informed of the charges against them; the loyalty order is ex post facto in effect, and there is no right to examine witnesses or evidence used against the accused. This is the type of un-American proceeding which...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Against the Loyalty Oaths | 12/5/1949 | See Source »

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next