Search Details

Word: bomb (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1960-1969
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...would think an atom bomb had exploded here. You never saw such excitement in your life as that about my making TIME. Every time I turn around, somebody tells me that they read your story of July 19-the faculty, the students, the beauty operators, the food clerks, and people on the streets whom I never saw before. I am as much of a celebrity here as the Kennedys are in Ireland...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Letters: Aug. 2, 1963 | 8/2/1963 | See Source »

...NOVEMBER 1951-France, Britain and the U.S. submit tripartite proposals for "armament and atohi bomb regulation." Says Russia's Andrei Vishinsky at the U.N.: "I laughed all night...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: World: TEST BAN CHRONOLOGY | 7/26/1963 | See Source »

Down for the Third Time? The tone of the Rockefeller statement indicated that he meant it to be a bomb, but it proved to be a bomb only in the show-business sense-a dud. Few Republican politicians even gave Rocky credit for being genuinely concerned about the direction of the G.O.P. Most of them appeared to think he was really concerned about his own political future rather than the party's. Even politicians who agreed with him that the influence of the radical right presents a danger to the Republican Party nonetheless assumed that he was politicking...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Republicans: The Bomb That Was a Bomb | 7/26/1963 | See Source »

Outside his own New York, Rockefeller's bomb drew the most cheers and fewest jeers in Michigan. "The conservatives," said Detroit's County Chairman Peter Spivack, "have been deluded into believing they can write off 10% of the nation. This is not only a wrong position; it's a silly one." Paul Bagwell, sometime G.O.P. candidate for Governor (1958 and 1960), said the party owed Rockefeller "a great debt of gratitude for speaking out." But Michigan's liking for the Rockefeller statement may have been partly traceable to hopes that a Rockefeller-Goldwater deadlock...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Republicans: The Bomb That Was a Bomb | 7/26/1963 | See Source »

...while, the fuel in its core (Con Ed plans to use 113 tons of uranium oxide) is contaminated with fiercely radioactive fission products. If this unpleasant stuff got spread around the countryside by any sort of explosion, it would do as much harm as the fallout from an atom bomb. Millions of people live within a few miles of Con Ed's projected installation. To reduce this danger to a minimum, the plant proposed for the Borough of Queens, on New York's East River, will have fantastically elaborate safeguards. The reactor core will be housed...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Nuclear Energy: Atoms Downtown | 7/26/1963 | See Source »

Previous | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | Next