Word: bomb
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1980-1989
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...Administration's announcement about the neutron bomb stirred some fears in Europe. The argument, which has evolved since deployment of the weapon was first discussed four years ago, is that the danger of the bomb stems from its very nature. Because it is so focused and so restricted in its effects, its opponents say, NATO generals might be too quick to use it if the Soviets attacked, thereby causing Moscow to retaliate with its own nuclear weapons. Thus it might become the catalyst for escalating a conventional war into a nuclear confrontation. Says retired General Wolf von Baudissin...
...decision to assemble the neutron bomb will further complicate other controversial weapons issues facing the allies, such as the upgrading of NATO's medium-range missiles as part of the planned modernization of theater nuclear forces (T.N.F.). Britain, West Germany and Italy have agreed to base new cruise and Pershing II missiles in their countries in an attempt to match the Soviets' tactical nuclear buildup. But they insisted that the T.N.F. modernization would proceed only on the condition that the U.S. would begin negotiations with the Soviet Union to limit tactical nuclear weapons in Europe. These talks...
...decision. France, which is not a member of the NATO military organization and is developing its own neutron warhead, gave what amounted to a qualified endorsement of the weapon. Said Charles Hernu, the Defense Minister in the new Socialist government of François Mitterrand: "The neutron bomb must not obscure the reality of the threats posed by the [Soviet] Euromissiles." In West Germany, Franz Josef Strauss, who was the conservative Christian Democratic opponent to Schmidt in last year's election, said that the "dismal situation of defense budgets" in NATO countries had left Reagan with no real alternative...
...warheads in Europe. West German Chancellor Schmidt, despite the opposition within his own party, at that time privately assured Carter that his government would eventually allow their deployment if other NATO countries would follow suit. Publicly, Schmidt said then, as he did last week, that the production of the bomb was "solely an American decision." But other NATO nations kept postponing a decision about accepting the weapon. In April 1978 Carter finally, and abruptly, decided to quit trying to win European support for the bomb. The U.S., he said, would merely build the components of the weapon and defer final...
...also sounded a more conciliatory tone than he had in the past, promising that the U.S. would respond in kind to any Soviet efforts to reduce international tensions "that are so costly to both our societies." He did not specifically mention the neutron bomb in his address, but last week's events made his main theme all the more compelling: "We must compete with the Soviet Union to protect freedom, but we must also search for cooperation to protect mankind." -By Walter Isaacson...