Search Details

Word: branzburg (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1970-1979
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...Branzburg vs. Hayes (1972). A reporter has no right to withhold information about his sources from a grand jury in a criminal investigation. The court was unmoved by the contention that confidential sources will dry up if reporters can be compelled to reveal them...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Law: A Dry Spell of Doubt for Reporters | 7/16/1979 | See Source »

...contempt for refusing to turn over to the defendant his notes at a murder trial. And it refused to review a U.S. Court of Appeals ruling that allowed Government investigators access to the telephone company's records of phone numbers called by journalists. Both cases, along with Branzburg, make it more difficult for reporters to preserve the confidentiality of sources...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Law: A Dry Spell of Doubt for Reporters | 7/16/1979 | See Source »

...high court's decision not to review that ruling does not affect similar cases in other states, but it leaves reporters everywhere guessing about the risk of fighting subpoenas. In Branzburg vs. Hayes (1972), the leading pronouncement on the subject, the Justices ruled 5 to 4 that reporters could not refuse to testify before a grand jury. The court did suggest, however, that states could enact "shield" laws to protect a reporter's sources and notes. New Jersey and 25 other states have them. In Farber's case, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided that the shield...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Law: Farber Finis | 12/11/1978 | See Source »

...flood did not actually begin with Farber, but with the Supreme Court's 1972 ruling in Branzburg vs. Hayes that reporters could be compelled to testify before grand juries. Many journalists argue that Branzburg and a few later decisions are proof of a growing judicial-and perhaps public-hostility toward the press, and fear that prosecutors and defense attorneys are exploiting that mood...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Press: Fallout from the Farber Case | 10/30/1978 | See Source »

...emphasis will be on Popkin's contention that the three remaining questions are not really relevant to the mainstream of the grand jury inquiry, in line with the court's decision in Branzburg vs. Hayes: his original argument -- that academicians are entitled to the same privilege of sources as journalists -- was shattered by the Supreme Court's reversal of the Caldwell decision...

Author: By Richard J. Meislin, | Title: Popkin Enters Last Ditch Stage | 10/21/1972 | See Source »

| 1 | 2 | Next