Word: budgeted
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1980-1989
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...tide began to recede in 1986, when Congress for the first time under Reagan cut the Pentagon budget below the previous year's. It did so again in 1987, and in 1988 allowed only modest growth, well below inflation. The 1989 budget will be the fourth relatively lean one in a row. Weinberger not only fought the trend, infuriating Congress by refusing even to discuss reductions, he continued to plan for future spending as if the Pentagon could count on once again getting a blank check. Last November, however, he resigned, to be succeeded by Carlucci, a veteran...
Weinberger left behind a budget request for fiscal 1989, which begins Oct. 1, that called for $333 billion in military funding. Negotiators for the White House and Congress agreed to reduce that to just under $300 billion -- with no guidelines on what to chop. The new Secretary of Defense had a mere five weeks before formal presentation of the amended budget to find $33 billion to slash...
Carlucci met the deadline and forced the Pentagon brass to come up with real cuts rather than paper ones. The Navy at first tried what cynics call the "Washington Monument strategy." That refers to the National Park Service practice of countering every budget cut with a proposal to reduce visiting hours at the nation's monuments -- knowing full well that Congress would never allow it. The Navy's version was to propose delaying a 4.3% military pay raise and killing both a Trident nuclear missile-firing submarine and two Los Angeles-class attack submarines, all congressional favorites. Carlucci coldly ordered...
Carlucci is now working on some five-year spending projections, based on the idea of a 2% annual increase in the Pentagon budget on top of inflation. Robert Costello, the Pentagon's "purchasing czar," estimates that such stability could enable the Defense Department to save as much as $30 billion annually through efficient management of buying programs, rather than the ) fits-and-starts practices forced by wildly fluctuating appropriations. Nonetheless, Carlucci recognizes that squeezing under even a 2% ceiling will require a "very intense major reorganization of the defense program...
...insists that he will not cut deeply into the operations-and-maintenance account, which pays for such items as training, ammunition and spare parts and has been a favorite target for past budget cutters. He is also determined to avoid "stretch-outs," the common practice of maintaining orders for tanks, say, or fighter planes but buying fewer each year than originally planned. Stretch-outs often cause production to fall below economic rates, so that the Pentagon ultimately pays more for each tank, plane or ship...