Word: cannotã
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
Commencement 2006 Charting a Progressive Course Bok, Knowles, and the presidential search committee should resist complacency By THE CRIMSON STAFF Wednesday, June 07, 2006 What the next president cannot??and must not—be is a merely charismatic and charming fundraiser who leaves each tub on its own bottom and lets each faculty do as it pleases. Harvard deserves more from its leader...
...progressive vision is more important than ever. Harvard’s president needs to ask the hard questions and push for answers, even if they are difficult or unconventional. He or she must centralize authority and fight Harvard’s tendency to factionalize into fiefdoms. What the president cannot??and must not—be is a merely charismatic and charming fundraiser who leaves each tub on its own bottom and lets each faculty do as it pleases. Harvard deserves more from its leader.We also hope that the committee seeks out a president who will understand...
...emptive, unilateral military action has been exposed as problematic because it extends an all-volunteer army to the point where it is stretched too thinly to respond to other crises that arise. At this point it is futile to demand that the United States intervene militarily simply because we cannot??too many troops are committed to fighting Iraqi insurgencies and policing Afghanistan. The only things that the Bush administration can (and must) do are enact economic sanctions, provide technical support to peacekeeping troops, and launch air strikes against Sudanese military installations to disable aircraft the government uses...
...those who would still deny a woman’s right to abortion, I have this, finally, to say: the decision of whether or not to have an abortion isn’t yours to make. You do not—and cannot??speak for the millions who will have to make this very difficult choice. It isn’t you who will carry the child in your womb for nine months; and it isn’t you who will have to raise...
With its latest series of reforms, Harvard can claim with some credibility to have turned over a new leaf in its treatment of workers. It cannot??and does not—claim to have eliminated poverty wages, or to have met the standards called for by the broader community. Until Harvard has improved its status as an employer by providing an acceptable wage minimum and the means for workers to organize freely, it cannot honestly claim to uphold any “principle” other than the bottom line. Until it has instituted measures to ensure transparency...