Search Details

Word: censorships (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...percent of first-years think "material on the Internet should be regulated by the government." Women's support of this was higher than men's. Aren't college students old enough to take care of themselves? And there's that whole inconvenient First Amendment issue. Funny. Dartboard thought censorship was unconstitutional...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: DARTBOARD | 4/9/1999 | See Source »

...silence. But there is no reason why it should be this way: if they are nothing more than prejudices, they should collapse, or at least be uncovered, when rigorously tackled. To criticize professors of not tackling them is one thing; to criticize students for voicing such opinions is unacceptable censorship...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Challenge Stated Prejudices | 3/18/1999 | See Source »

...silence. But there is no reason why it should be this way: if they are nothing more than prejudices, they should collapse, or at least be uncovered, when rigorously tackled. To criticize professors of not tackling them is one thing; to criticize students for voicing such opinions is unacceptable censorship...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Letters | 3/18/1999 | See Source »

Students for Choice say that they "do not blame The Crimson," but permeating the entire letter are calls for the "review of information" in the advertisement, and for the "notice [of] the journalistic approach." The group treads lightly in an attempt not to utter the ugly name of censorship, which lurks beneath the surface of the letter. Indeed, the closing line, which deems the decision to publish the advertisement "a disgraceful action on the part of The Crimson," contradicts the group's claim to be holding back blame...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Advertising and Content Rightly Kept Separate | 3/2/1999 | See Source »

...Students for Choice say that they "do not blame The Crimson," but permeating the entire letter are calls for the "review of information" in the advertisement, and for the "notice [of] the journalistic approach." The group treads lightly in an attempt not to utter the ugly name of censorship, which lurks beneath the surface of the letter. Indeed, the closing line, which deems the decision to publish the advertisement "a disgraceful action on the part of The Crimson," contradicts the group's claim to be holding back blame...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Letters | 3/2/1999 | See Source »

Previous | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | Next