Search Details

Word: characterized (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1900-1909
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

In the first place we contend that the presence of intercollegiate football in college life offers, more than any other undergraduate activity, a clean and whole-some interest for the student, giving rise to a pure atmosphere in college life that would otherwise be lacking. We contend that as a...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: PRINCETON WON THE DEBATE | 12/16/1905 | See Source »

W. M. Shohl, closed the main argument of the negative. Intercollegiate football is, he said, a great developer of character, in that it encourages and fosters in a man an intense loyalty to an ideal, his college. He works hard every day for a period of two months. He is...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: PRINCETON WON THE DEBATE | 12/16/1905 | See Source »

A. Fox made the first rebuttal speech for the negative. Our opponents, he said, have brought out three distinct detriments; the physical harm, the loss of time, which should rather be given to studies, and the bad moral effect. On the other side of the scale the negative has shown...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: PRINCETON WON THE DEBATE | 12/16/1905 | See Source »

W. M. Shohl made the second speech for the negative. Football is a dangerous game our opponents say, but we have answered this argument and cited evidence. The statistics of our opponents are not real statistics; they have given us a one-sided argument. Lists of injuries are not statistics...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: PRINCETON WON THE DEBATE | 12/16/1905 | See Source »

G. J. Hirsch was the last speaker for the negative. The gentlemen from Princeton, he said, have brought forward three distinct objections. They have exaggerated the prevalence of injuries, but have not stated their permanency. Many of their facts are unsupported by sufficient evidence. Football takes time that should be...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: PRINCETON WON THE DEBATE | 12/16/1905 | See Source »

Previous | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | Next