Word: cites
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
Then the alarmists cite the example of the San Francisco Giants' Juan Marichal, who had a bit of bad luck after appearing on our cover (June 10). But he finished the season as one of the two best pitchers in the league. What about Hank Bauer? His Baltimore Orioles seemed to have the pennant locked up, until the Sept. 11, 1964 cover, after which they lost half their games. Jinxed by TIME? "I don't believe in that stuff," growls Bauer. He was named Manager of the Year in 1964, and his team proved unjinxable earlier this month...
...Post itself, Kay Graham, for one, is convinced that whatever its remaining faults, her paper is winning and stimulating readers as never before. For evidence, she has only to cite President Johnson, who reads the Post's first edition the last thing before going to sleep, then reads the last edition the first thing on waking up. For a President who is not known for his love of the press, he pays the paper a rare compliment. It plays the news, he says, "right down the middle...
...report. They argue that the commission was determined to prove that Oswald was the lone assassin and that it blandly ignored or distorted any information that differed significantly from that premise. Some of them say that Oswald was not involved at all. Among the facts that they cite to support that contention...
...What Do You Want?" The upshot of the Mississippi march may well be to harden positions on both sides of the black-power quarrel. The militants can be expected to cite the savagery of white Mississippians as proof that Negroes can hardly expect much in the way of help from whites. The moderates can be expected to counter, as Ralph Abernathy, one of King's aides, did recently, with the argument that "if the philosophy of an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth is carried to its ultimate conclusion, we are eventually going to have...
...have just compiled a second edition of a directory listing 800 little magazines [June 3]. You cite only four, all of the stuffy, academic ilk that would have been dead long ago (with the possible exception of Sixties) if forced to go it alone like the truly independent and gutsy publications where virtually all significant writers get their start. You can't really think that those four mags represent the field. Did you ever hear of The Smith? Poetry Newsletter? Manhattan Review? Ole? Earth? Probably not, because you live too far off the ground...