Word: coded
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1980-1989
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...second point about last spring is that the ACSR did vote for divestiture from companies that do not abide by the Sullivan Principles, a minimal code of ethics for firms doing business in South Africa. According to ACSR representative Claude Convisser '84, the vote was 12-0, not 10-2 as reported in the Gazette. Still, Harvard did not divest from companies that have not signed the cosmetic Sullivan Principles, so that even if the ACSR were to gain agreement on the more significant issue of total divestiture it is unlikely that this would work to make the Corporation divest...
Indeed, Bok's intransigence is the reason that the ACSR had to even vote on the Sullivan Principles. By March 24, 1978, a few months after Reverend Sullivan formulated his code of "ethics" for business in South Africa, the ACSR had already recommended Harvard's enforcement of the Sullivan Principles. On page seven of his open letter of April 1978, Derek Bok said the Harvard Corporation would uphold the Sullivan Principles as recommended by the ACSR. The reason that the ACSR had to make that same recommendation again in 1983 is that Derek Bok had lied. The Harvard Corporation never...
With both goalies on their game and each team playing hard-hitting hockey, it took power plays to score the night's two goals. The Crimson got its score 15 seconds after Yale defenseman Gary Davidson left the ice for interference. Gary Martin passed from the boards to Ken Code just outside the crease. Code flipped the puck over to Jay North, who gloved it down and blasted it up into the inside corner before Tortorella could move across to stop...
...North (Ken Code, Gary Martin), 9:45; Y, Sean neely (Pete Sawkins, Mome Tobin...
This money will support the discriminatory practices of ROTC. ROTC, like all programs under the Department of Defense, specifically excludes all gay people and people with disabilities, regardless of their ability or conduct The military code declares that homosexuality is incompatible with military service. This has been interpreted to mean that all gay people, even if they are not "guilty" of homosexual affections with another person, are to be excluded or expelled front the armed forces. For the military, the potential of an individual for same sex attraction is enough to warrant a court-martial, usually ending in a dishonorable...