Search Details

Word: columnized (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1940-1949
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...department's eight-column story on the life & works of David Alfaro Siqueiros, Mexican painter-soldier-politician, in the Nov. 10 issue is, to a large extent, the result of a year's acquaintanceship between Artist Siqueiros and John Stanton, chief of TIME Inc.'s Mexico City bureau. Because the detail and sound analysis of Stanton's research also showed a warm understanding of Mexican ways, I asked him to tell me about the business of being a correspondent in Mexico as it applied to the Siqueiros story. This is his reply...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: A Letter From The Publisher, Dec. 1, 1947 | 12/1/1947 | See Source »

...before the Senate." In the Senate, Labor Minister Prio Socarrás had been called on the carpet last week to explain why he threw the Communists out of Havana's Labor Palace last August (TIME, Aug. 11). He told the Senate that the Reds were a fifth column for Russia, that they did not belong in the Labor Palace and that they did not represent Cuban labor. By the time he had finished almost everyone but the Communists seemed satisfied. Prio hoped that his Senate success had placed him securely in the No. 1 position to succeed...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: CUBA: Prio's Progress | 12/1/1947 | See Source »

Under the late, larruping Publisher Frederick G. Bonfils, the only editorial voice in the Denver Post was a column called "That's That." It was written, then and after Bonfils' death in 1933, by a mild-mannered little man named Bruce Gustin. When Palmer Hoyt took over...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Press: Postman v. Post | 11/24/1947 | See Source »

Post in 1946, he started an editorial page, gave Gustin a byline so readers would know that the columnist no longer expressed Post views. Last week Gustin proved that his column is still a potent editorial voice...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Press: Postman v. Post | 11/24/1947 | See Source »

...with customary gusto. The proposed charter, like everything Bonfils and Gustin had opposed in the old days, was "absurd, ridiculous, asinine, idiotic, and doesn't make sense." Gustin ignored Post editorials across the page. Post editorials ignored Gustin-except once, when a political advertisement quoted from a Gustin column. Then the Post once more warned readers that Gustin spoke only for Gustin. But the paper made no attempt to edit or censor Gustin's columns. Acknowledged Gustin: "A remarkable demonstration of broadmindedness...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Press: Postman v. Post | 11/24/1947 | See Source »

Previous | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | Next