Search Details

Word: compton (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1930-1939
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...several years, while cosmic ray research was emerging from its infancy, University of Chicago's Compton engaged in a polite but nonetheless spirited controversy with California Institute of Technology's Robert Andrews Millikan. Compton contended that the rays were mostly electric particles, Millikan that they were mostly photons (electrically inert bundles of radiation). In January 1936, Compton presented a thoroughgoing resume of his researches up to that time which neutral observers considered a "cosmic clearance"-i.e., a victory for Compton (TIME, Jan. 13, 1936). By that time most cosmic ray workers were speaking in terms of particles...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Science: Ray Retraction | 7/11/1938 | See Source »

...Compton, like practically all of his colleagues, still believes the rays to be particles. The retraction he made last week concerned their place of origin. He once believed they came from the remotest depths of space beyond the Milky Way, which is the huge galaxy of stars to which the sun and its planets inconspicuously belong. The disc-shaped Milky Way appears to be slowly rotating like an enormous wheel. Therefore, if the rays come from outside the galaxy, whichever side of Earth happens to be facing the direction of rotation should receive a few more rays than the back...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Science: Ray Retraction | 7/11/1938 | See Source »

Since then Dr. Compton, who has seven observation stations in his far-flung cosmic ray empire, has checked up on the variation. Another cosmic ray bigwig, Professor Manuel Sandoval Vallarta of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, calculated what it should be theoretically, after discounting the effect of the magnetic field of the sun. On making this correction, the observed variation was practically nil. Hence, Dr. Compton now prefers to believe that the cosmic rays come from within, not without, the Milky Way-that they whiz around inside it like rats in a trap, prisoned there by the gigantic magnetic field...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Science: Ray Retraction | 7/11/1938 | See Source »

...Compton prefers this explanation for another reason. If the cosmic particles were thought to come from outside the Milky Way, it must be presumed that all space is filled with them, that they represent a vaster total of energy than star light - in fact, the greater part of the energy of the universe. If they are of Milky Way origin, however, their intensity is reasonably set down as an effect of "local" concentration...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Science: Ray Retraction | 7/11/1938 | See Source »

This theory - which Dr. Compton admitted last week is only tentative - nevertheless bumps into the views of Belgium's Abbé Georges Lemaitre, proponent of the "Exploding Universe." Abbe Lemaitre believes the cosmic rays are fragments of a universal explosion which took place bil lions of years ago, and therefore that the rays should fill all space more or less uniformly. This is only one of several hypotheses advanced to account for the rays' origin. Dr. Millikan used to believe they were liberated in interstellar space during the coalescence of light elements into heavier ones. Dr. Fritz Zwicky...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Science: Ray Retraction | 7/11/1938 | See Source »

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | Next