Word: contemptibly
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1960-1969
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...Last week, she packed up her mother, her brother, two sons, daughter-in-law, cat and dog and flew to Hawaii. Madalyn's family thereby 1) jumped bail bonds totaling $8,750, 2) violated two Baltimore court orders, 3) fled a dozen charges ranging from assault to contempt of court...
...family, Son Bill did not help matters by locking his legs around a table and howling: "I won't go back to that cell." As six policemen carried him out of the courtroom, Bill yelled at Judge Joseph Finnerty: "You Christian! You Catholic!" The judge promptly added a contempt-of-court charge to the list of Bill's other offenses...
...Reaching Honolulu, Madalyn faced a few unpleasant surprises. Buddhists, who do not like to think of themselves as atheists, constitute only about one-third of the island's population. The majority of the rest of Hawaiians are Catholic. And back home in Baltimore, a judge added two more contempt-of-court citations to the charges, arising out of the police melee, that a grand jury returned. Mrs. Murray may never have to face the music. Although she is legally subject to extradition, Baltimore seldom tries to recapture defendants on the lam except for serious crimes, and the state...
When a Hartford County crime commission three years ago tried to question Malloy about his employer and finances at the time of his 1959 arrest, Malloy invoked the privilege and refused to answer any questions. He was tossed into prison for contempt after a Connecticut court, relying on more than 50 years of the Supreme Court's own rulings, declared that the federal Fifth does not apply in state courts. Malloy had been assured by Connecticut authorities that because of the state's one year statute of limitations for misdemeanors, he was not exposing himself to further state...
...court also overturned the New Jersey contempt conviction of two longshoremen who had invoked the privilege despite state pledges of immunity against prosecution. The longshoremen had argued that they feared federal authorities would use their state-immunized testimony to build a federal case against them. Putting an end to that peril, too, the court held "that the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination protects a state witness against incrimination under federal as well as state law and a federal witness against incrimination under state as well as federal...