Search Details

Word: contemptibly (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1960-1969
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...Rights bill. Sen. Hubert Humphrey indicated the long pause was over when he changed his description of the Southern oratory from extended debate to filibuster. But it was a Southerner, Sen. Herman Talmadge, who ended the preliminaries with amendments designed to guarantee jury trials for all cases of criminal contempt arising from the bill...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Debate in Earnest | 4/27/1964 | See Source »

...response to the Talmadge amendment, Senate leaders Mansfield and Dirksen have prepared a substitute. Their measure reportedly will allow the judge to grant or deny jury trial on criminal contempt charges; however, a person convicted without a jury could not be fined more than $300 or imprisoned for more than 30 days...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Debate in Earnest | 4/27/1964 | See Source »

Much of the ideological invective between Moscow and Peking camouflages rivalry between two great if unequal powers. Mao's pride in his ideological subtlety and his own Chinese Communist revolution-which he accomplished largely unaided by Russia-obviously mingles with his pride in an ancient culture and his contempt for Khrushchev as a belly-slapping vulgarian...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Communists: The Battle over the Tomb | 4/24/1964 | See Source »

...Supreme Court's recent decision on Governor Ross Barnett was both encouraging and frustrating. The Court held that Barnett may be tried without jury for contempt of a U.S. Court order directing him to stop obstructing James Meredith's admission into the University of Mississippi. But at the same time it warned in a footnote that the conviction could be reversed if the penalty imposed were not "petty...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights | 4/22/1964 | See Source »

Viewed in the perspective of a long battle against arbitrary judicial power, against government by injunction, the decision marked an advance for civil liberties. Before passage of the Norris-LaGuardia Act of 1932, federal judges often issued injunctions against strikes and other union activities, leveling harsh sentences for criminal contempt without calling upon the grand jury for an indictment or allowing trial by jury. This unusual legal power of both accusing and judging has a long common law tradition, although it is inconsistent with the whole grand jury and petit jury system. Now the court has at least ruled that...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights | 4/22/1964 | See Source »

Previous | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | Next