Search Details

Word: content (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1970-1979
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...conviction. Speaking for the court, Justice William Brennan said that Ginzburg's products should not be considered out of context; his promotional efforts showed he was pandering to prurient interests. The mailed advertisements, said Brennan, "stimulated the reader" to look "for titillation, not for saving intellectual content...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Law: Premature Obscenity | 2/21/1972 | See Source »

...singular corruptness. Actors shove their way to the front of the stage like runners in a relay race. Their troubles are all for nothing; DeThrill walks off without signing a single contract, and even virtuous Polly and her boy friend don't reach the bigtime. They, however, are simply content with what they've got. "I could be happy with you, If you could be happy with...

Author: By Esther Dyson, | Title: What Every Girl Wants | 2/18/1972 | See Source »

Coach Edo Marion believes that his team will be challenged by the MIT squad, but is confident that they can win. In December, Harvard barely squeeked by the Engineers, 14-13, but Marion believes that his team has improved considerably since that contest although he is not fully content with their progress...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Crimson Fencers Face MIT In Rematch of Close Contest | 2/15/1972 | See Source »

...asked questions, says Mr. Nwafor. What questions, and of whom? And what were the answer? If Mr. Nwafor was on a ten days' State Department tour of the United States studying racism would he be content, say, with seeing only Roy Wilkins and not talking to Huey Newton and Angela Davis? He assumes that Mao is right? Has he talked to any of the followers of Lin Piao or Liu Shao Chi? Was there comradely debate? Did he ask to read their documents? Yet he has seen the truth and the light...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: JAGO VS. NWAFOR | 2/14/1972 | See Source »

Hartman declined to reveal the content of his memo until the GSD Faculty has had a chance to consider it. The memo may mean that he is questioning how the review committee was formed or submitting an entirely new proposal...

Author: By Daniel Swanson, | Title: GSD Faculty May Discuss Hartman Probe | 2/2/1972 | See Source »

Previous | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | Next