Word: controling
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1900-1909
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...minority report together with their own. This attempt on the part of the majority to check a full discussion of the proposed changes affords a strong reason why the Society should refuse to adopt their plan. Men who are not perfectly fair should not be given permanent and complete control of the Society. MEMBER OF THE SOCIETY...
Clarkson pitched well for Harvard keeping the nine hits made by Holy Cross scattered and showing good control at critical moments, striking out nine men and giving one base on balls. At the bat, however, he failed to make a hit. Matthews was unsteady at second base, made two errors and failed to get a hit. Coolidge played well at short stop and got one of the hits. Wendell had no chances in the field, drew two bases on balls, but flied out to left field on both his other turns at the bat. Skilton had no chances in right...
...stockholders are: (1) that they shall make no personal profit as stockholders, and (2) that they shall divide profits each year into dividends and capital, the relative amounts of each being, however, as the Directors determine. The members cannot be sure then that, if they vote away their control, the present method of management will last for more than a day. It is not proposed to have the Directors chosen as before as was stated yesterday. The power of choosing Directors is to be taken away from the members and given to the stockholders. If the stockholders wish, they...
What is the chief reason for this change? The change in the control is made incidental to incorporation. But it has not been shown that incorporation is necessary. Our Society under its present management has been strikingly successful. It is on a sound financial basis, and is committed to a very safe and conservative policy. Its permanent capital has reached the sum of $32,000, it does for the most part a cash business, has practically no debts, and is entitled to the best rating that Bradstreet or Dun give. The condition of affairs of the Society, being such ought...
...University stay here but a little while and cannot take the assets of the Co-operative Society with them when they go, yet we ought to have regard for the interests of our successors, as sur predecessors had for ours, and not give up once and for all the control of this Society without better reasons than have been given in favor of doing so. M. A. SULLIVAN, Member of the Board of Directors