Search Details

Word: cooperating (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1980-1989
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...thought-provoking letter to the Crimson, Undergraduate Council Vice-Chairman Jeffrey A. Cooper '90 refuted my strongly worded February 29th column which, among other things, criticized Mr. Cooper for seeking to "represent the students in the final clubs as much as those who aren't." I had argued that it was unreasonable for the Vice Chairman to favor final club members, who represent "a small minority of the college population...

Author: By Mitchell A. Orenstein, | Title: Getting Off the Fence | 3/10/1988 | See Source »

...Cooper argues convincingly that I wouldn't have criticized him had the minority in question been black students or women. And of course, he is right. However, he doesn't stop there. In brilliant rhetorical style he advances from a defensive position into a high-flung moral argument, invoking Tocqueville's "tyranny of the majority" to defend his representation of that poor, tyrannized campus minority, final club members. Mr. Cooper will not, he says, "yield to popular passions on issues of prejudice or discrimination" against final club members...

Author: By Mitchell A. Orenstein, | Title: Getting Off the Fence | 3/10/1988 | See Source »

...Cooper decide to represent the all-male elite as opposed to the women who are discriminated against by the final clubs? Apparently, Mr. Cooper holds some bizarre ideas about equity in representation and thought he could represent both sides in this struggle. In the council, Cooper voted against the resolution denouncing the clubs. He voted in favor of giving Lisa Schkolnick money for her suit, but introduced an amendment to give equal funding to the Fly Club if they needed...

Author: By Mitchell A. Orenstein, | Title: Getting Off the Fence | 3/10/1988 | See Source »

Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote that "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines." In striving to be fair to both sides, Cooper, in effect, supported the final clubs. The failed attempt of Mr. Cooper's `evenhandedness' suggests why the council must take a stand on important campus issues. The council cannot support both sides of a discrimination suit any more than the United States can support both sides in a war. Supporting both sides equally enforces the status...

Author: By Mitchell A. Orenstein, | Title: Getting Off the Fence | 3/10/1988 | See Source »

Possession, after all, is 90 percent of the law. The final clubs own their buildings. They refuse to admit women, and will continue to do so until this campus takes action to stop them. If Cooper and the council are truly interested in equality, they will side with the women who are discriminated against by the clubs. If they refuse to take a stand, or try to represent both sides equally, the council ends up siding with the status quo. And since final club sexism is the status quo, refusal to fight it, in effect, supports...

Author: By Mitchell A. Orenstein, | Title: Getting Off the Fence | 3/10/1988 | See Source »

Previous | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | Next