Word: crr
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...article by Susan C. Faludi (December 18) was welcome in that it attempted to remedy the almost total lack of knowledge among students concerning the origin, structure, and purpose of CRR. Unfortunately, it was most notable for what...
Faludi says students "have forgotten that students and faculty were not equally represented on the committee panel," but fails to mention that, largely through the efforts of students selected to sit on CRR, the composition of CRR is now set at seven faculty members and six students...
Faludi also says students have forgotten that faculty or administrators "could not be prosecuted for breaking the same rules as students." It is not clear what she had in mind, nor why it is relevant to the question of student participation on CRR. While it is true that the Faculty's CRR has jurisdiction only over complaints of students violations of the Resolution, officers of the University are not exempt from its provisions...
...complaint that CRR or the Committee of Fifteen did not allow "appeal outside of itself," it is not clear where such an appeal would reasonably be directed within the University. CRR is indeed a faculty-student, rather than administrative, committee. It is not clear to me what body would be better suited to hear cases...
...dissatisfaction with CRR stems not from its "tainted" origin, but from its shadowy nature. CRR appears to give students some voice in handling of a subset of disciplinary cases, but CRR has in reality no clear jurisdiction and could be easily circumvented. The method of selection of student representatives is haphazard...