Search Details

Word: crude (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1940-1949
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...figured the sources of United Nations' supply for 1942 as: 706,000 long tons in the U.S. stockpile of which the President spoke; 453,000 tons of new crude (less losses from sinkings); 28,000 tons of synthetic production in the U.S.; 54,000 tons of synthetic in Russia. Total stores: 1,241,000 tons...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Roosevelt Rubber Lecture | 6/22/1942 | See Source »

...that submarines had driven East Coast tankers into port, and that tankers had brought in 90% of the oil supply. The railroads were hauling valiantly, pipelines were slowly gurgling oil east at their three-mile-an-hour rate. But they brought east only 900,000 barrels of crude oil a day, when the daily need was some 1,265,000 barrels...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Shanks' Mare | 6/1/1942 | See Source »

Stop-gap arrangements were being hurried. The White House approved the building of wooden barges to carry crude oil on inland waterways from Florida. A House committee approved a bill for a pipeline from Florida's west coast to Jacksonville, another for improvement of a Florida barge canal. Harold Ickes announced that a beginning had been made on relocation of two existing pipelines, which would send an additional 25,000 barrels daily to the East by July 15. But real relief would be a major transportation operation-and that...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Shanks' Mare | 6/1/1942 | See Source »

Three years ago Mussolini was still popular in Italy. Today, said Matthews, he is the butt of crude jokes. More cynical than Anglo-Saxons, the Italians scorn Mussolini for the unforgivable Italian sin: making a fool of oneself. On May 9 their attitude was bored or ominous silence when Mussolini stalked to the reviewing stand on the Via Impero to celebrate the tragic farce of African Empire...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: INTERNATIONAL: Home Sweet Home | 5/25/1942 | See Source »

...losses (and for rationing) is the tanker shortage. The big shift from water to land transportation has quadrupled oil freight costs or worse, accounting for $100,000,000 of the loss. (The rest comes from reduced refinery volume, etc.) Secretary Ickes last week told how the oil companies bought crude in Texas for 85? a bbl., paid $1.65 rail shipping costs, then sold it at a price-fixed $1.80 for a net loss of 70? a bbl. Atlantic Refining showed first-quarter profits of only $1,237,000 ($2,600,000 a year ago), explained that delivery costs per barrel...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: OIL: No Tankers, No Profits | 5/18/1942 | See Source »

Previous | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | Next