Word: cues
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1980-1989
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
Under the Dowling plan, the new housing and student life committees would each be composed of five students and five Faculty. There would also be a 10-member, student-Faculty committee on education, similar to the current CUE. All the students on these committees would come from appropriate subcommittees of the new council. Unlike the assembly, which consists of one delegate for every 75 undergraduates (96 total), the council would consist of five delegates from each upperclass House and 20 freshmen (75 total...
...more efficient and responsive bureaucracy. The present structure of governance for the College is best described as amorphous; it includes a Student Assembly, which is unrecognized by the Faculty of Arts and Sciences; a students-only Educational Resources Group, which has input into the Committee on Undergraduate Education (CUE), a student-Faculty group; the large and unwieldy student-Faculty Committee on Houses and Undergraduate Life (CHUL); the Faculty Council and its never-heard-from subcommittees; the Faculty itself, which meets, ideally, once a month; 13 House committees; and the Freshman Council--among other bodies...
...last year. Chaired by John E. Dowling '57, professor of Biology, the group produced a document that has come to be known as the Dowling Report, which suggested several changes in the structure of College governance. The primary alterations include establishing a student council with five subcommittees and retaining CUE--which Dowling Committee members considered the model committee--while splitting CHUL in two. The Faculty Council-Faculty structure would remain intact under the Dowling plan, which also proposes adding a $10 term-bill subcharge to provide the student council with a budget to organize activities and fund straggling undergraduate groups...
...awards' presentation, David Riesman '31 will read short citations on each winner, composed of quotations about Nash and Hughes Hallett from students' letters of recommendation and from the CUE Guide to Courses, Gullette said...
Debate on the alternatives open to students has been restricted by the way the governance issue has been treated. When the Dowling Committee was formed, the only students invited were delegates from the existing governance bodies--CHUL. Student Assembly and CUE. The next problem was the secrecy that surrounded committee meetings: the committee excluded interested students and the press from observing some of its deliberations. And once the report came out, much was done to minimize debate over its recommendations. CHUL decided not to allow amendments to the proposal, thereby hoping to avoid controversy. At the most recent CHUL meeting...