Word: darwinismã
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...today, a nine-hour Origin-a-thon will be held in five different locations throughout campus for a full reading of Darwin’s “On the Origin of Species.” Browne and Andrew Berry are teaching an “Understanding Darwinism?? class open to the public, and Harvard scholars will discuss the scientist’s impact on their work in a “Darwin and Me” afternoon symposium. The Cambridge Queen’s Head Pub is hosting a birthday party from 8-10 p.m., featuring free...
...fulfill these categories. The Gen Ed committee has also had trouble this year filling the social science categories Societies of the World and United States in the World. Only one of the 13 science classes approved thus far—Science of Living Systems 12: “Understanding Darwinism??—was designed specifically for the Gen Ed program. The other courses, including both of the science offerings approved last week, have previously been offered either as department or Core courses. Harris emphasized, however, that even though the Gen Ed committee has been filling...
...same token, social science concentrators can avoid literature by taking “Elements of Rhetoric” for Aesthetic and Interpretive Understanding, and humanities concentrators can avoid hard science by taking “Understanding Darwinism?? for Science of Living Systems...
...very talented people that work in the different development offices of the different schools are responsible first and foremost to that school,” former FAS Dean William C. Kirby said. He used the phrase “bureaucratic Darwinism?? to describe cases where independent development offices fight over the attention of generous donors who have a wide range of interests...
Those same proponents of intelligent design will likely squawk that my “dogmatic Darwinism?? has caused me to stifle a debate because I have previous commitments to philosophical naturalism. So let’s set the record straight. Evolutionary theory is a tumultuous field where many differing views are now competing for dominance. Moreover, “intelligent design” cannot even be considered among possible alternatives because it fails the basic tests of any scientific hypothesis. First, it cannot be proven false. Second, it explains nothing about the actual mechanism of evolution...
| 1 |