Search Details

Word: dean (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1960-1969
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...only concrete action in response to Wolff's proposals came in the middle of the debate. J. Peterson Elder, dean of the GSAS, announced that he would appoint a special student-Faculty committee to investigate sources of graduate student income--one of the issues considered by the Wolff report...

Author: By James M. Fallows, | Title: Faculty Delays Vote On Wolff Proposals, Will Act Next Month | 4/9/1969 | See Source »

...accordance with the POC report, George P. Baker '25, dean of the Business School, approved a precedent-setting plan whereby the HarBus and the CRIMSON would be given in advance the agenda of both MBA and full Faculty meetings...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: MBA Faculty Backs Students' Attendance Bid | 4/9/1969 | See Source »

Also participating in yesterday's briefing were Charles J. Christenson, professor of Business Administration; John B. Matthews, professor of Business Administration; and John A. Seiler '51, assistant dean for the MBA program

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: MBA Faculty Backs Students' Attendance Bid | 4/9/1969 | See Source »

Prior to the SFAC meeting, many Faculty members and students had attacked President Pusey's stand on ROTC, as expressed in his letter to Dean Ford, for what they felt was a misinterpretation of the Faculty's intent. There had been no chance to question him, however, about the reasoning behind the "egregious misuse" of the resolution. Few believed that he had maliciously misinterpreted the resolution; most liberals on SFAC seemed to believe that he had some special reasons for saying what he had. These, many felt, might be brought to light by his testimony before the closed meeting which...

Author: By Robert M. Krim, | Title: Pusey at SFAC | 4/9/1969 | See Source »

OTHERS ON SFAC appeared to feel that his stand, which he had couched in academic terms in his letter to Dean Ford, should be more honestly stated in political terms. Several SFAC members asked peripheral questions trying to get the President to edge toward a political justification for his position. Stephen J. Gould, assistant professor of Geological Sciences, asked President Pusey why he had neglected to mention the CEP resolution, which the Faculty has soundly defeated, while commending the Faculty for defeating the Putnam resolution, in his letter to Dean Ford. Both the CEP and Putnam resolutions had been rejected...

Author: By Robert M. Krim, | Title: Pusey at SFAC | 4/9/1969 | See Source »

Previous | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | Next