Search Details

Word: defensesã (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...challenge fell to Gale—the 6’0, 235-lb. hulk—who makes his living wearing down defenses??€™ fronts. With the Huskies dominating time of possession in the first half, you thought for sure it was going to work. That it would be only be a matter of time before the Balestracci-sized Gale would be running through giant holes and exhausted defenders...

Author: By Lande A. Spottswood, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: The Promised Lande: Defensive Tackles Set Tone, Plug Gaps | 10/6/2003 | See Source »

Falling behind two goals changed the outlook for the Crimson. With only nine minutes left to play, the team knew that it needed to score quickly—and somehow break through one of the nation’s top defenses??€”not once, but twice...

Author: By Wes Kauble, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: F. Hockey Gives No. 3 Wake a Scare | 10/7/2002 | See Source »

Against the Quakers—who boast one of the nation’s best rushing defenses??€”Murphy made what may have been his boldest call yet. On Harvard’s opening series, the Crimson ran 13 plays. All but four of them were handoffs to senior tailback Josh Staph, who gained the majority of his 54 rushing yards on that drive alone. Harvard didn’t score on the series, but that was not necessarily the point...

Author: By Brian E. Fallon, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Murphy Helps Crimson Get Back To The Basics | 11/15/2001 | See Source »

Against the Quakers—who boast one of the nation’s best rushing defenses??€”Murphy made what may have been his boldest call yet. On Harvard’s opening series, the Crimson ran 13 plays. All but four of them were handoffs to senior tailback Josh Staph, who gained the majority of his 54 rushing yards on that drive alone. Harvard didn’t score on the series, but that was not necessarily the point...

Author: By Brian E. Falon, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Murphy Guides Football to Dream Season | 11/14/2001 | See Source »

Bush reasons that the world has changed since the 1972 treaty was signed. The treaty had relied for deterrence on the absence of missile defenses??€”and thus a guarantee of mutual destruction after any first strike—to keep the peace between the U.S. and the Soviet Union. But in an age when dictators like Saddam Hussein could obtain nuclear weapons, a rogue state could launch an attack and might just be crazy enough to accept the horrible consequences. Bush’s arguments on those grounds, however, fall flat. Most terrorists or rogue states lack...

Author: By The CRIMSON Staff, | Title: Missle Defense Policy Flawed | 5/7/2001 | See Source »

Previous | 1 | 2 |