Search Details

Word: deqe (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...Harvard entered hearings with the state DEQE, and in 1978 the University received a ruling that the plant would be too environmentally harmful to be built. In the summer of 1980, the case came up for reconsideration, with protesters remaining adamantly opposed to the plant’s construction...

Author: By Claire A. Pasternack, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Total Energy to Total Disaster | 6/4/2003 | See Source »

...When the DEQE called a meeting at the State House with Harvard’s lawyers to schedule a hearing so the case could be reconsidered, about 15 Brookline and Boston residents barricaded the meeting room doors in protest. After capitol police were summoned and the meeting cancelled, it was held by telephone with Harvard threatening to take the governmental agency to court if its permit was denied...

Author: By Claire A. Pasternack, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Total Energy to Total Disaster | 6/4/2003 | See Source »

After 186 hours of oral testimony that led to 7,300 pages of transcript documents, the DEQE approved MATEP’s construction in November 1980, provided that Harvard follow 32 operating conditions, including the creation of stations to monitor the plant’s emissions...

Author: By Claire A. Pasternack, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Total Energy to Total Disaster | 6/4/2003 | See Source »

...DEQE was only one in a series of hurdles the project had to clear. MATEP’s planners insisted that the plant be exempt from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) pollution regulations because of Harvard’s non-profit status. In December 1980, Bok wrote to then-Massachusetts Gov. Edward J. King seeking exemption from the act, which was granted on a probationary basis...

Author: By Claire A. Pasternack, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Total Energy to Total Disaster | 6/4/2003 | See Source »

...while the plant began to provide chilled water and steam in 1981, the engines—whose purpose was to produce electricity—could not yet be turned on, pending a final ruling from the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) on the DEQE decision, which had been appealed once again by local activists. Because the plant was only partially operational, its co-generation cost savings remained unrealized as MATEP’s price tag swelled to $230 million...

Author: By Claire A. Pasternack, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Total Energy to Total Disaster | 6/4/2003 | See Source »

| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | Next