Search Details

Word: diverted (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1950-1959
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

This was done until 1932 when Lowell House acquired the bust and assumed the cleaning expenses. But it then took the Corporation 18 years to decide to divert the income from the fund to "maintenance of the Yard...

Author: By David C. D. rogers, | Title: Bum Wampum Teaches University To Look All Gift Horse in Mouths | 12/4/1952 | See Source »

...people are not even morbidly interested in his private affairs, and it is an unseemly act ... Certainly, this is not a time to seek to divert attention to unimportant side shows like the petty personal fling at Nixon, or the quibble over Stevenson's use of private contributions. Must this buffoonery be further prolonged...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Letters, Oct. 20, 1952 | 10/20/1952 | See Source »

...aluminum v. 4$ at Alcoa's most recent U.S. facilities) to offset the cost of transporting alumina all the way north and finished aluminum to market. Alcoa is ready to raise the whole $400 million unaided, provided that 1) Canada will give permission to dam the river and divert the water, and 2) the U.S. will help Alcoa get title to the 20,000 acres of Alaskan land needed for the site (present homesteading laws limit one Alaskan purchase to 160 acres). The plan has already won the informal backing of the U.S. Defense Department. Moreover, Alcoa, a onetime...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: ALUMINUM: Alcoa in Alaska | 9/1/1952 | See Source »

...breaks up the division by asking his sergeant to tuck him into bed, captures a general during maneuvers, jumps from a plane without his chute and lands on Dean's parachute in midair. The screenplay of Jumping Jacks is lighter than air, but the picture may divert those moviegoers who relish Dean's singing and Jerry's uninhibited simiantics...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Cinema: The New Pictures, Aug. 4, 1952 | 8/4/1952 | See Source »

...lower power rates would simply be subsidized by taxpayers. The Government's argument about preserving the natural beauty of the Falls did not stand up, because either public or private power would have to build the same number of installations, and both, under the treaty, would have to divert the bulk of the water flow at night so as not to spoil the Falls' beauty...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: UTILITIES: Who Gets Niagara? | 6/16/1952 | See Source »

Previous | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | Next