Word: documentation
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1960-1969
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...Arneson and Tony Tallarico. Featuring such greats as Bobman and Teddy, Gaullefinger, and Superlbj, it is worth approximately seven of the ten minutes it takes to read it. Ideologically wrong, of course, but it only costs a dollar. And the battle between Wonderbird and Chefman is an historical document...
...waged unremitting warfare on those manufacturers and retailers who resort to deceptive labeling, packaging and pricing devices. Armed with a slide rule to make her point that every shopper needs one, the "guardian of the gullible," as Mrs. Peterson styles herself, invades supermarkets throughout the nation to document such casuistic come-ons as the "jumbo quart" (exact volume unspecified), the "25?-off" special (off what?), and the "all-new" product (only the price is). Among her particular bêtes noires are the "giant-size" box that contains more air than substance and the practice of pricing by fractions, whih...
...have been forbidden to read under pain of sin. Last week Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviana, whose Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is responsible for deciding which books to condemn, announced that the Index would never again be updated or reprinted, and will henceforth serve merely "as a historic document...
...drafters of the document-Harold Taylor, onetime president of Sarah Lawrence College, and Betty Goetz Lall, of Cornell University's School of Industrial and Labor Relations-deny any such intent. As the leaders of the Manhattan-based National Research Council on Peace Strategy, which issues statements on foreign policy, they feel that they consulted enough China scholars on the wording of their paper, and that they circulated it sufficiently. No other U.S. newspaper, however, shared the Times's enthusiasm for the document. If they ran anything on it at all, most papers carried a much shorter Associated Press...
Acute Scholaritis. "I and the New York Times," says Wicker, "thought and still think the document was a considerable contribution to debate on the subject." He attributed the complaints to what he calls the "China lobby." But the fact is that the criticism came from all quarters. In his appearance before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee last week, David Nelson Rowe, political science professor at Yale, charged the Times with "at the very least a gross distortion of the meaning of the statistics. Such are the distortions of propagandistic journalism." The liberal Reporter magazine editorialized: "The Times built the release...