Search Details

Word: dressler (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Coach Floyd Wilson will probably start Barry Williams, Keith Sedlacek, Gene Dressler, Lynn Bennion, and George Neville. Bennion has improved a good deal in recent games, and the 6-6 center has been giving Williams some help with rebounding. Neville, after losing his starting berth to sophomore Jeff Grate, had outstanding games against Dartmouth and Penn...

Author: By R. ANDREW Seyer, | Title: Crimson Five to Face Cornell Squad Tonight | 2/11/1966 | See Source »

...winning strategy for the Crimson could be to use a full-court press constantly. This may seem an absurd suggestion, since Neuman is easily the best ball handler in the backcourt with Gene Dressler, George Neville, Bob Beller, and Jeff Grate. With this depth, Harvard can afford to press and probably wear down Neuman and Pawlak. Besides, if Penn is able to get the ball downcourt Tom Mallison (6-10). Frank Burgess (6-9), and John Hellings (6-8) can murder Harvard under the boards...

Author: By R. ANDREW Beyer, | Title: Five Faces Penn, Princeton Powerhouses | 2/2/1966 | See Source »

Barry Williams, Gene Dressler, and Sedlacek all scored in double figures. Williams had 15 points and Dressler 11. Sedlacek, guarded very closely throughout the game by Bill Engster, had only three field goals, but sank 10 of 11 from the foul line...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Neville Leads Crimson in 74-70 Win; Hoopsters Capture First Ivy Victory | 1/20/1966 | See Source »

...with an 11-point average. The guards are 6-1 Bill Engster (6.8) and 6-2 Joe Colgan (4.7). Dartmouth's center, 6-7 Gunnar Malm, has the best name in the Ivy League and a 12.7 average. HARVARD SCORING FG FT Pts. Ave. Sedlacek 119 60 298 21.2 Dressler 86 38 210 15.0 Williams 54 47 155 11.0 Neville 37 24 98 7.0 Grate 34 24 92 7.7 Scott...

Author: By R. ANDREW Seyer, | Title: Bennion, Grate to Start As Five Faces Indians | 1/19/1966 | See Source »

Sedlacek and Dressler were Harvard's leading scorers with 18 points, but the Crimson's overall shooting was very bad: they hit only 19 of 58 shots from the floor. Princeton's shooting was almost as cold, but the difference was the Tigers' height. The height advantage does not show up so much in the rebounding totals (44 to 35), but the Tigers were able to block about a dozen Harvard shots...

Author: By R. ANDREW Beyer, | Title: Desperation 45-Footer Tips Five at Princeton | 1/17/1966 | See Source »

Previous | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | Next