Search Details

Word: du (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Despite the continuing back and forth on the issue du jour, whether it's a long-running campus debate or a national controversy, one thing is clear: The campus left has grown tamer. When it comes to partisan politics, the visible activists on campus are predominantly conservative. And perhaps it is conservatives, more than liberals, who will forge Harvard's reputation for the future...

Author: By David B. Lat, | Title: Where Have All the Liberals Gone? | 6/10/1993 | See Source »

...Paul Du Fays...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Seniors Share Their Most Embarrassing Moments and Fondest Memories | 6/9/1993 | See Source »

...crucial questions for policymakers was whether CFCs would remain in the atmosphere for a long time. Asked today when it was proved that CFCs could hang around for many decades, Du Pont scientists readily acknowledge that the issue was largely put to rest in the '70s. As late as 1982, however, a Du Pont scientist was still arguing in print that CFCs were short-lived...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Who Lost the Ozone? | 5/10/1993 | See Source »

...delay. For nearly a decade before the 1987 ozone treaty, nations were warned of the danger but did nothing. In the U.S. those who had the power to take action instead engaged in self-delusion: the Reagan Administration at first dismissed the ozone threat as a nonissue, while Du Pont and other manufacturers underestimated future sales of CFCs, making the hazard seem minimal...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Who Lost the Ozone? | 5/10/1993 | See Source »

...Du Pont, which poured $15 million into developing substitutes during the late 1970s, all but halted its research shortly after Reagan's election because no further regulation was on the horizon. Earlier, Du Pont had publicly committed itself to stop production of CFCs if "reputable evidence" showed they posed a hazard to the ozone layer. The company, however, set a tough standard for what constituted "reputable evidence." Du Pont challenged Rowland at every turn in the 1970s, and he believes the company's aggressiveness sent a chilling message to other scientists in the field...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Who Lost the Ozone? | 5/10/1993 | See Source »

Previous | 226 | 227 | 228 | 229 | 230 | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | 241 | 242 | 243 | 244 | 245 | 246 | Next