Search Details

Word: employeees (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

The Crimson now contends that the judge erred in concluding that documents held in the custody of the HUPD did not fall within the scope of G.L. c. 66, § 10. It points out that the statutory language manifests a clear legislative intent to give the public broad access to...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Text of Supreme Judicial Court Opinion in Crimson v. Harvard | 1/13/2006 | See Source »

General Laws c. 66, § 10, expressly limits that statute's reach to every person having custody of a "public record," as that term is defined in G.L. c. 4, § 7, Twenty-sixth. [FN6] That clause, in turn, provides that "[p]ublic records" are those "made or received by...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Text of Supreme Judicial Court Opinion in Crimson v. Harvard | 1/13/2006 | See Source »

Contrary to the Crimson's argument, documents in the custody of the HUPD do not become "public records" simply because some of the HUPD officers have been appointed "special" State police officers under G.L. c. 22C, § 63. This statute provides that the colonel of the department of State police...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Text of Supreme Judicial Court Opinion in Crimson v. Harvard | 1/13/2006 | See Source »

Regulations promulgated by the colonel pursuant to G.L. c. 22C, § 69, similarly specify that, to be eligible for appointment as a special State police officer, a person must be "an employee of an agency described in [G.L. c. 22C, §§ 56- 68]." 515 Code Mass. Regs. § 5.04...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Text of Supreme Judicial Court Opinion in Crimson v. Harvard | 1/13/2006 | See Source »

The Crimson's efforts to establish a correlation between a "special [S]tate employee" or "special county employee" for purposes of the Massachusetts conflict of interest statute, G.L. c. 268A, § 1, and an HUPD officer who has been appointed as a "special State police officer" or a deputy sheriff...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Text of Supreme Judicial Court Opinion in Crimson v. Harvard | 1/13/2006 | See Source »

Previous | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | Next