Word: employs
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1930-1939
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
Neither would any contract be awarded to any company, "reorganized" or not, which had in its employ any of the 32 officials named by Mr. Farley as having attended Walter Folger Brown's "spoils" conference...
...Government in London had instant repercussions in the national Government last week. No sooner had the County Council an nounced its slum clearance program than the national Government pulled from its hat the largest slum clearance project Britain has ever known. Covering all England and Wales, it was to employ 115,000 men continuously for five years, cost the nation ?115,000,000 ($575,000,000). In various cities 266,851 tenements were to be demolished and new houses built, to rent from $1.50 to $2 per week for small houses, from $2.25 to $3 for flats. In country districts...
Robert Gordon Switz was born in East Orange 30 years ago, the son of Theodore Switz, a naturalized Russian. His brother Paul was a star footballer, Yale 1929. Brother Theodore is a chemical economist, employed until recently by Lehman Corp., an investment trust sponsored by the New York banking firm from which Herbert H. Lehman resigned when he became Governor of New York. Robert attended Mercersburg Academy, did not go to college. In 1922 he shipped as a seaman on the S. S. St. Paul in a pair of white linen knickerbockers with $5 in cash. Landing in Hamburg...
...says explicitly that employers must deal with "representatives" that the workmen themselves choose or elect. But in the case of the employ organizations, created within a shop or wholly from employees of a certain company, with no outside spokesmen from National Labor Unions, the question arises whether the election was fair and whether these same unions, if really left to themselves, without influence from the employer's side, would join the A. F. of L. system or retain their own spokesmen...
...Roosevelt myth, that "system and "organization" and "planning" can enable a broken industrial structure to employ millions of men and to increase wages, will last just so long as the Labor Board can avoid facing the issue. One ounce of national collective bargaining, through the American Federation of Labor, is enough to upset the scales. The case against the Roosevelt myth has been drawn up by the employers, who show convincingly that they can no longer afford to make the concessions which the administration demands. It has also been presented by Mr. Harold Laski and Mr. John Strachey, who point...