Search Details

Word: excessive (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1940-1949
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...bill to permit manufacturers to amortize the cost of Defense plants within five years which would give them reasonable protection. Then the President had qualms. Warned that many a Congressman would oppose outright concessions to Business, he had the amortization bill tacked to a complex limitation on excess profits. Net result: certainty that Congress will haggle over this hybrid measure for weeks, while key manufacturers, unsure of their future, remain unwilling to accept Defense orders...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: PRODUCTION: Mr. Knudsen's Eggs | 8/5/1940 | See Source »

...testimony in trials that resulted it appeared that: In eight years Union Electric's Lobbyist Albert Laun and his friends had developed a slush fund of at least $525,000 which never appeared on Union Electric's books. One company lawyer had kicked back $111,000 in excess fees; another $42,000; a Kansas City equipment salesman had kicked back $70,000; insurance companies had refunded $80,000. This money then went into the campaign funds of candidates for every office in Union Electric's territory from alderman to Governor of Missouri. Laun, reported Shelton, kept...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: UTILITIES: Scandals in St. Louis | 7/29/1940 | See Source »

Capital's fear of the excess-profits tax now in the works (TIME, July 15) was thus partly assuaged. Also soothing was a second White House announcement: the Vinson-Trammell Act, which limits profits of ship and aircraft builders to 7 and 8% on Government contracts, would be repealed (Congress willing). Makers of war goods were thenceforth to be considered just as useful and profit-meriting people as any other manufacturers. For them, it was a forgotten but not a new sensation. In 1918 they were given special tax incentives; in the '20s they were shamed or starved...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: WAR FRONT: State of Rearmament | 7/22/1940 | See Source »

...normally $9,000 yearly) to cover its share of Pullman expenses (porters, linens, maintenance, etc.) and what Pullman calls a fair return, Pullman keeps the car's entire sleeping ticket revenue. If the car earns more than its set fee, Pullman splits (usually 50-50) the excess with the railroads at year...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: RAILROADS: Pullman Monopoly | 7/22/1940 | See Source »

Justification for this double monopoly has long rested on three main points: 1) if individual railroads had to meet traffic peaks with their own sleeping and parlor cars, they would be burdened with a large excess investment; 2) because many sleeping car operations are through operations over several roads' tracks, it takes a single building and operating company to make them efficient; 3) such a service requires a specialized personnel and equipment maintained by one company...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: RAILROADS: Pullman Monopoly | 7/22/1940 | See Source »

Previous | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | Next