Search Details

Word: expels (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1960-1969
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Reassurance & Tranquilizers. Among a sampling of 88 patients who complained of painful gas, Dr. Danhof found that 25% had simply swallowed too much air. Some of these patients, suffering from anxiety, could not expel all the air by belching, and retained so much that it caused painful distention in the gastrointestinal tract. In these cases, said Dr. Danhof, the most effective treatment is reassurance, which may be reinforced with tranquilizers and accompanied by instructions to exhale completely before swallowing food or drink...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Digestion: Painful Bubbles | 12/8/1967 | See Source »

...Argentines weighed in with a giddy show, which includes Julio Le Fare's kinetics, David Tamelas' 20-ft-high minimal cubes, and poppish plastic nudes by Juan Carlos di Stefano so obscene that one local official threatened to expel them. Poland's Tadeus Kantor shows that the Iron Curtain has long since popped wide open with his portrait collage of a stuffed shirt (with shirt). France's Baldaccini Cesar took another of the ten minor prizes with his sculptures of Mobil Oil cans and plastic. He disdained it, snorting "Ask Pablo [Picasso], or Sartre, or Fidel...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Exhibitions: Shape for the Future | 9/29/1967 | See Source »

...than take merely $1,700 over five years. It was all O'Hare's fault for sloppy bookkeeping, Dodd argued, calling him "a liar and a forger and a thief." Moreover, Dodd declared, if the Senate really believed one of its members guilty of larceny, it should expel him outright rather than censure him. It was a shrewd challenge. At week's end the Senate agreed to vote separately on the billing and campaign-fund counts...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Senate: Dodd's Defense | 6/23/1967 | See Source »

Instead, representatives have justified the action as an extension of their constitutional right to expel members of the House. This extension seems unjustified. As one Law School professor has pointed out, exclusion only requires a majority vote and assumes a preliminary judgement by the electorate; expulsion requires two thirds and seems intended to allow members to deal with a colleague who has acted wrongly once elected. The power of expulsion is lumped together in the Constitution with each chamber's right to "punish its members for disorderly behavior," suggesting that it is intended to protect the regular operation of each...

Author: By Marvin E. Milbauer, | Title: Powell and the Law | 6/12/1967 | See Source »

...eased if the Supreme Court simply chose to say that any exclusion based on constitutional qualifications would not be reviewable by the judiciary. The way would then be open for the House to find that Powell is not an inhabitant of New York State, or to admit and then expel him. Regardless of the justice of such action, Powell would have no recourse to the courts; but it would be harder to muster the required majority in the House for such a decision...

Author: By Marvin E. Milbauer, | Title: Powell and the Law | 6/12/1967 | See Source »

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | Next