Search Details

Word: fact (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1960-1969
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...conceded that because of the small sample size, a reasonable disparity in monthly averages could be expected. In fact, the average monthly draft number varied from 225.8 in March to 121.5 in December...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: M.I.T. Students Claim Poor Shuffling Brought Unfair Order to Draft Lottery | 12/16/1969 | See Source »

...committee, chaired by Jerome Kagan, professor of Development Psychology, "gave us a three hour notice to bring in a concrete proposal, despite the fact that there were still a lot of unanswered questions involving the role of Claverly, Mather House people, and signed commitments to move," Kaplan said...

Author: By John G. Simon, | Title: Dunster Men Develop Coed Plan; Hope to Exchange With the 'Cliffe | 12/15/1969 | See Source »

...fact, however, this is a non-event, a propaganda ploy. But that doesn't motter, because our hero is a non-reporter, a spy hypnotically trained to kill the scientists...

Author: By Garrett Epps, | Title: Sci-fiLight Years Away | 12/15/1969 | See Source »

Section 203 of the recently enacted Military Procurement Bill forbids the Defense Department, beginning next year, to fund any research not having "a direct and apparent relationship to a specific military function." Does the Cambridge Project in fact have such a relationship...

Author: By Jeff Magalif, | Title: The Cambridge Project: An Interview | 12/15/1969 | See Source »

...other fact was the inclusion in our report of an unanimous recommendation that the Faculty refrain from voting on the report. Clearly, the minority, all of whom joined in his view, believed that a higher issue was at stake than an opportunity to win in the Faculty a majority that it could not win in the Committee. My impression is that this higher issue was the recognition that a number of important and complex principles were bound together in Project Cambridge and that a simple vote would not reveal which principles were being supported and which were being rejected...

Author: By Paul Doty and Mallinckrodt PROFESSOR Of biochemlatry, S | Title: The Mail CAMBRIDGE PROJECT | 12/13/1969 | See Source »

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next