Word: feeding
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1960-1969
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...used." Naturally Petunya refuses to help bring in the harvest. " 'If I had a cow I might, but otherwise, why bother?' The chairman understands . . . Every year thousands of acres of hay are lost because kolkhozniki get only 10% of the hay they harvest. In order to feed his own cow he would have to harvest enough for eight or nine-and that's impossible. Each year it gets harder and harder to find workers for the kolkhoz silo...
...Gimmicks? To feed the hunger, the papers apparently decided that the best diet was the mixture as before. The News, with the biggest circulation in the U.S. (2,055,266), and the Times, with the biggest reputation, stuck with proven recipes. The others promised major changes that turned out. at best, to be bits of fancy garnishing...
...horses are human.'' They are at any rate more intelligent than most of the people connected with his picture. Any donkey could have written the script ("These horses are very unique in the world"). The supporting players (Lilli Palmer. Curt Jurgens. Eddie Albert) are obviously off their feed. And Actor Taylor-well, frankly, a horse that acts the way he does would instantly be shipped to the glue factory...
...long as Diem stays in power Vietnam will remain a bottomless pit for American money and lives. While American aid sustains him against the guerillas in the name of anti-Communism, Diem--by refusing to institute reforms--perpetuates and aggravates the conditions that feed rebellion...
Freeman claims that his 1962 feed grain program was a "dramatic success." He points to sharp drops in the CCC's inventories of corn and other feed grains. That claim is sharply disputed by President Charles Shuman of the National Farm Bureau Federation, biggest of U.S. farmer organizations. Freeman's 1962 feed grain venture, says Shuman, cost about $768 million in diversion payments, with additional expenditures for higher price supports and extra administrative expenses. For its money, argues Shuman, the Agriculture Department got too little: the farmers participating in the program increased their per-acre yields so effectively...