Search Details

Word: filmã (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

This surface beauty, communicated so effectively by Scott and her able team of actresses, and so essential to the film??s message, can nonetheless sometimes work against the film??s value as a piece of engaging cinema. One can easily tire of the brooding, plaintive gazes, and the zoomed-in, sped-up shot of a blooming flower in one scene is simply indulgent. Sometimes “Cracks” can feel like a watercolor painting; still and soft and lacking dashes of exuberant feeling...

Author: By Michael A. Yashinsky, CONTRIBUTING WRITER | Title: Cracks | 4/27/2010 | See Source »

Wesman said that he found out about his selection for Cannes over spring break while on a road trip with his friend and the film??s producer, Pomona senior Ian T. Carr...

Author: By Elizabeth D. Pyjov, CONTRIBUTING WRITER | Title: Senior Thesis Film Accepted to Cannes | 4/23/2010 | See Source »

However, despite these shortcomings and the lack of originality in the film??s premise and plot, the movie can be genuinely funny at parts. Especially good are the one-liners placed throughout the film which add a certain comedic charm...

Author: By Chris A. Henderson, CONTRIBUTING WRITER | Title: Death at a Funeral | 4/20/2010 | See Source »

Borte shoots much of the film??s action in reflections—in mirrors, the sleek surfaces of the Jones home, and, during the climactic sequence, in a swimming pool. This technique effectively communicates the characters’ absorption in their own images, and how they define themselves through their purchases. It also accuses the viewer of engaging in the same kind of tireless self-promotion. Not only does our consumerism make us fall prey to advertisements, but our fixation with self-image puts us in danger of becoming advertisements ourselves...

Author: By Sally K. Scopa, CONTRIBUTING WRITER | Title: The Joneses | 4/20/2010 | See Source »

...director of “Lunatic” decides to avoid the flashiness of noir cinematography, the piece is still set in 1956, and Hobbs and the production team have decided not to rewrite it. There is no good solution to the dilemma of when to set the film??to rewrite the script would amount to utter stylistic dismemberment, but to film “Lunatic” as a period piece endows it with a very different meaning than it would have had as a contemporary film in 1956. To place the resurrected “Lunatic?...

Author: By Abigail B. Lind, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Leave the Resurrections to Christ: Kubrick’s Potential Disaster | 4/20/2010 | See Source »

| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | Next