Word: final
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1910-1919
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...league games in particular are noteworthy as showing a remarkable improvement in the team. Reviewing the contests throughout the season there is to be noted a steady building up of a machine which reached its full strength shortly before the end of the season. The playing in the final game with Haverford fell short of the usual standard probably because of the unfavorable weather conditions. Even in this game, although the breaks were against it and probably prevented the winning score, the University players showed themselves better able to battle with the snow and heavy field and superior in team...
...next game with Pennsylvania on November 18, the University players showed a slight slump in form and were swept off their feet by the visiting team in the last few minutes of play, the final score standing 3 to 2 in Pennsylvania's favor. This proved to be the last defeat, however, for the team came back in splendid fashion and defeated Yale and Dartmouth by the scores of 2 to 0 and 2 to 1, respectively. Both games were very fast and both were good exhibitions of unified playing...
Although the team showed a marked brace for the final game of the season with Haverford last Saturday and kept the ball in the visitors' territory most of the time, the necessary "push" was lacking and neither side was able to get the winning goal after two extra five-minute periods had been played. The tie score assures Haverford of third place in the league with a per centage of 600, having won three games, lost one and tied one. If the visitors had won they would have been tied for first place with Princeton and Pennsylvania. On the other...
...Juniors won from the Sophomores in the final debate of the interclass series last evening, successfully maintaining the affirmative of the question, "Resolved, that the United States should establish a temporary protectorate in Mexico until order and stable government are assured." W. A. Hosmer, W. L. Prosser and C. E. Fraser, who composed the Junior team, spoke in the order named, and L. Dennis, S. A. Freeman and W. Hettleman represented the Sophomores. Henry Epstein 1L and J. H. Spitz '17 were the judges...
...real test of the Harvard-Yale game lay in the centre of the line, and the Crimson trio were outweighed and outeharged, and there is the story. Mr. Jones has builded well at New Haven, but he is likely to meet a harder test in his final games next year than fell to his lot this...